Payday loans-about-us page Payday loans Can I repay the loan early

Pentagon Study Dismisses Risk Of Openly Gay Troops

Posted By Guest Butch, K

Click photo to read the original story

The Pentagon’s study on gays in the military has determined that overturning the “don’t ask, don’t tell” ban on serving openly might cause some disruption at first but would not create widespread or long-lasting problems.

The study provides ammunition to congressional Democrats struggling to overturn the law. But even with the release of Tuesday’s report, there is no indication they can overcome fierce Republican objections with just a few weeks left in this year’s postelection congressional session.

Still, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, said Congress should act quickly because of a recent effort by a federal judge to overturn the law.

Gates said the military needs time to prepare for such an adjustment, even though he said he didn’t envision any changes to housing or other personnel policies. He said a sudden, court-issued mandate would significantly increase the risk of disruption.

“Given the present circumstances, those that choose not to act legislatively are rolling the dice that this policy will not be abruptly overturned by the courts,” Gates told reporters.

The co-chairs of the study, Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson and Army Gen. Carter Ham, wrote, “We are both convinced that our military can do this, even during this time of war.”

Overall, the survey found that some two-thirds of troops don’t care if the ban is lifted. Of the 30 percent who objected, most were members of combat units.

In fact, at least 40 percent of combat troops said the acceptance of gays serving openly would be a bad idea. That number climbs to 58 percent among Marines serving in combat roles.

A summary of the report says 69 percent of respondents believe they have already served alongside a gay person. Of those who believed that, 92 percent said their units were able to work together and 8 percent said the units functioned poorly as a result.

“We have a gay guy. He’s big, he’s mean and he kills lots of bad guys. No one cared that he was gay,” the report quotes a member of the special operations force as saying.

The report predicts that many gay troops would still keep their sexual orientation quiet even after the ban was lifted. That discretion would probably be more common in the military than in the civilian world, the reports authors said.

Of the survey respondents who said they were gay, only 15 percent said they would want that known to everyone in their unit.

The summary included anonymous quotes from gay troops currently serving.

“I will just be me,” one person said. “I will bring my family to family events. I will put family pictures on my desk. I am not going to go up to people and say, ‘Hi there. I’m gay.’”

Gates said he didn’t think the Pentagon would have to rewrite its regulations on housing, benefits or fraternization.

“Existing policies can and should be applied equally to homosexuals as well as heterosexuals,” he said, adding that the change could be addressed through increased training and education.

Though some troops suggested during the study that there should be separate bath and living facilities for gays, the report recommended against it because it would be a “logistical nightmare, expensive and impossible to administer.”

Further, separate facilities would stigmatize gays and lesbians in the way that “separate but equal” facilities did to blacks before the 1960s, it said.

The report said commanders could address individual concerns on a case-by-case basis.

The survey is based on responses by some 115,000 troops and 44,200 military spouses to more than a half million questionnaires distributed last summer by an independent polling firm.

The House has already voted to overturn the law as part of a broader defense policy bill. But Senate Republicans have blocked the measure because they say not enough time has been allowed for debate on unrelated provisions in the bill.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has promised a vote on the matter by the end of the year, after hearings can be held this week on the Pentagon study. Still, some gay rights groups contend that Democratic leaders have done little to push for repeal before the new Congress takes over in January.

Reid spokesman Jim Manley said the majority leader is “very much committed to doing away with the ban this year” and that it was the GOP’s fault for blocking the bill.

___

Associated Press writers Anne Gearan, Pauline Jelinek and Julie Pace contributed to this report.

8 Responses to “Pentagon Study Dismisses Risk Of Openly Gay Troops”

  1. Rexie December 1, 2010 at 11:13 pm Permalink

    Thanks, K….

  2. Sasha December 1, 2010 at 11:48 pm Permalink

    This is so ridiculous. I hate to even read this stuff because it makes me so mad. I’m guilty of the ostrich syndrome by choice. I stick my head in the sand at least once a week and pretend that the entire world isn’t this dumb.

    Separate living quarters? Really? I love it when straight people think that we all want them. All of them! LOL … I had a straight acquaintance one time tell me, “Look, I’m NOT gay so don’t try to hit on me.”

    To which I uncontrollably laughed in her face and blurted out, “Oh honey, don’t flatter yourself. You’re not even my type.”

    I didn’t mean to sound so mean but her insulting tone was more then I could handle and the assumption that just because she was a female, I would be unable to control my gay urges! PUH-LEEEEEEZ.

    Enough already.

    My dad was a Marine. He’s all for gays in the military.

    My future wife was a Marine. I’m sure you know where she stands.

    Two of the best people I have ever known in my entire life were Marines and they both support gays in the Military.

    The Republicans have their heads in the sand if they really don’t believe that gays already serve an integral part in our military and that denying them their rights relegates them and their families to second class citizens at best. It’s a cryin’ shame.

  3. Elegy December 2, 2010 at 4:20 am Permalink

    I’m glad this study turned out favorably, and hope it serves as positive ammunition (if not in time, in the near future).

  4. RadDyke December 2, 2010 at 5:17 am Permalink

    Thanks for keeping us up on current events, K. I love that you do this.
    Baby steps…I can’t wait for this shit to get repealed. My partner is the widow of a vet who died because of combat-related injuries. She supports getting rid of this stupid law. She said he would have too.

    Of course, we’re leaving so much of the activism around it to the HRC…is it any wonder things aren’t getting done?

  5. Jazmenha December 2, 2010 at 10:06 am Permalink

    Being a professional photographer (my other job hehe) this photograph really struck me. Of course so did what was written, but more than anything the humanity in this soldiers eyes tell his personal story of frustration, dedication, pain and tenacity. A picture truly IS worth a thousand words. These soldiers are people- brothers, sisters, husbands, wives, friends, daughters, sons… Thanks for writing this K.

  6. K December 2, 2010 at 12:07 pm Permalink

    What I find interesting is that they want seperate quarters to avoid violence in the troops. But what good will that do? Seperate quarters for men and women doesn’t stop the rape of hundreds of women OR men….sssooooo???? By seperating the queers its gonna do that??? Negative.

  7. K December 2, 2010 at 7:52 pm Permalink

    Oooooohhh my dear RadDyke please don’t get me started on the HRC. Unbelievable as it is, they claim to be an umbrella group that “includes” ALL GLBT groups….eeennnhhhh wrong! The T is generally dropped from their defensive strategies. BULLSHIT!!!

  8. Elegy December 5, 2010 at 4:05 pm Permalink

    Hurrrr, I don’t know where exactly to post this, but I am angry:
    http://www.autostraddle.com/lesbian-soccer-coach-resigns-68423/ >.<

Leave a Reply